Does free speech and 1st amendment protect purely retaliatory claims-speech and legal actions?
According to this link, the courts mostly say yes, but some new opinions may differ.
That this apparent consensus gives way to the newer interpretation would accord with some of my thinking elsewhere that, (following) from the falsity of the speech-action distinction (without a difference), free speech cannot justify intentionally (and purely?) malicious hurtful speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment